Adobe creative suite system requirements mac

The CS5. Or, instantly download a free trial for any of these products. Thank you for subscribing! We hope you enjoy the newsletter and your free Adobe books Click here to see the books now , and start downloading and reading! Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again. We respect your privacy and take protecting it seriously. Thanks for subscribing! Comprehensive Creative Suite 5 and 5.

Dreamweaver CS5. InDesign CS5. Flash Professional CS5. Flash Catalyst CS5. Premiere Pro CS5. After Effects CS5. Audition CS5. That support ends in January of for Windows 7, but for Windows 8. So Windows 8. So, regardless of market share, MS will support 8. That's why Adobe's dropping support for 8. Shouldn't Adobe support 8. And the percentage of users for the various operating systems depends on who is taking the data, and from whom. And actually, if we're going to play a "numbers game" as to which OSes Adobe should support, then you could make the argument that they shouldn't support MacOS at all.

If you go by the numbers shown on that W3 Schools site I posted the link to in my previous post, Win 8. If you could subtract the MacOS versions that Abode won't support out of that 9. But Adobe's programming costs for making their applications compatible with MacOS, which is a whole different operating system from Windows, have to be much larger than what they'd spend on maintaining compatibility with Win 8.

It doesn't make sense unless they're just penny pinching in any way possible. Is there some sort of a collaboration with Microsoft? Abandoning support Windows 7 and 8 is ok, many other developers did this. But limiting us to the latest version of the current OS means those of us who uses cracked Windows will consider buying the legit one or every now and then fidget to look for and install the latest crack. If you're using a pirated version of Windows I have no sympathy. But for paying customers of both Windows and the Adobe Creative Cloud Adobe's move is a real drag, especially in Adobe's case.

Doesn't my paying a monthly licensing fee to Adobe for a CC subscription entitle me to continual updates, -no matter what OS I'm using? That's my current beef with what Adobe intends to do. I've been getting updates and support for my current OS up to now, -so if I continue to pay the fee then why won't I get them in the future? It's not like they're not deriving income from me, as I pay them every month. I think this is just pure greed on Adobe's part. Someone came up with this idea because it would improve their bottom line, and everyone else there said "sure!

And it's not like Adobe's not making any money as things stand now. Pure greed. I am still running 8. Upgrading OS has been a nuisance at best or a time consuming pain with few real benefits for me. I now only upgrade an OS with a new PC. I certainly won't be paying to upgrade to 10, working out hardware problems, drivers, etc. I will stick as is and if necessary move to alternative software. Seems like Adobe and MS have a deal. Adobe and MS? What about Apple then?

Limited to latest version of Apples OS too. It's just Adobe, nowt to do with MS and Apple. My main uses for creative software is to work on marketing for a small consumer goods startup. I have no desire to move on from Windows 8.

  1. Language availability?
  2. noise reduction software for mac os x.
  3. blackberry desktop software mac old version?

I did try w10 but found the performance sacrifice to be too great on cpu intensive tasks. Not liking this at all. To update, I'll have to move to the latest can't just move one version up , and I can almost guarantee I'll take a performance hit on the newer OS. I am in the same situation with a MBP El Capitan, can't upgrade further and Win 7 laptops, all approaching 10 years. I will never buy another Adobe product when my LR6 stops working. Companies that force you to buy they products deserves to go bankrupt.

LR6 will not suddenly stop working and no one is forcing you to buy Adobe products, try not to overreact. Lots of overreaction - kinda. Wink, Wink , say no more. This place is flooded lot's of posts with users who only have a few posts and they know exactly where to go and what to say. Bet most have never even used Adobe products. Very entertaining indeed. Well, at some point it will lose camera RAW updates, then it will no longer support newer cameras, so once you buy a new camera, it will effectively, stop working.

Is that so. Guess you never heard of DNG. By the way what you have said has already come to pass about 6 months ago. The last update was in December of Any cameras released before are supported. Define a new camera. A Canon 5D4 which was released in might be a new camera to someone who just purchased it. It helps to provide all the facts. And where cameras can output DNG natively, they can be used by Lightroom 6 anyway. Lightroom 6 can handle DNG version 1. For comparison, the new Pentax K-1ii uses 1. Maybe you should stop playing so dumb or is it something else?

CS6 does not stop working because you can still use it. There have been multiple threads discussing that very thing. How would people new to this and exploring options know this with your vague expiation know these things. This place is absolutely flooded with trolls and I expect many work for competing companies. I'm not saying you are one but I don't know DPreview even wastes its time even posting articles about Adobe as just it just brings everyone out.

This is just as bad as when this place had an Open Forum. Multiple new members with a few posts all saying the same thing and going as far as saying I'll have Adobe Sucks on my tombstone. Not saying that member is a troll but are you kidding? Over software? People are writing poems, etc. You know if you have 20 email addresses you can be 20 members here if you want to. They publish a free-to-anyone specification for DNG.

Read, write, etc. They provide a free for anyone to use very comprehensive SDK, lots of source as well as other components , to enable anyone wanting to manipulate DNGs to write the code to do so. Much of this is recent; dated and They provide comprehensive support for DNG in their products. The DNG Converter enables users of Lightroom 6 to stay with it instead of switching to a different product.

Remember that Adobe developed and owned PDF. Ditto XMP. They own TIFF. Name a camera company that behaves like that! Adobe couldn't withdraw DNG if they wanted to! Why would they? Why tick your older version customers off that may one day may decide go subscription? Why do they still give you 2BG of cloud storage if you drop the plan? Keep your customers close. The announcement which is much ado about nothing.

I'm running a 6 year computer and is getting close to it's life cycle with the latest OS. I'm no where near the cut-off point. Because they have already ticked off many of their customers. That's due to greed and arrogance. No you didn't. You are die hard anti Adobe just like on other sites. No matter what is said you will find something to try a way to try and scare people off. I don't know why. Sure they could kill DNG. I think your constant speculation about ones future doom if they use Abode products is hyperbole. People work around stuff.

How do you know they have ticked off a lot of customers? By reading what all the trolls here say whenever there is some information about Adobe. Maybe you should look at how well they are doing. I don't like Adobe anymore than car dealerships. I tried others but Adobe best suit my current requirements. I have and will continue to expect my computers need to be replaced every 5 to 7 years. Okay, I'm out of this, I think I am being confused for the other Phil. I use LR daily. I do see both sides though. See 3 again. Your workflow will thank you.

Today's Photoshop and Lightroom are overweight, sluggish, and not nearly as fast as they should be.

Creative Cloud system requirements

When you see how ridiculously fast PS 7 runs, it will put a smile on your face. Assuming you can live with an alternative method of converting your raw files, you should be fine. Never allow a single company to control any part of your creative process. Try to edit images individually in Photoshop from a wedding in 90 minutes.. Clarity, HSL, crop and so on and export it to 4 different formats.. Lightroom's strength is the ability to manage, as well as edit, lots of photos. For example, I have more than , photos in my Lightroom catalogue dating back very many years.

Every photo I capture goes into Lightroom, because that is where I decide whether to reject them. Photoshop has some editing capability that Lightroom doesn't, so I use it for a minority of my photos. Then the Photoshop files themselves end up in the Lightroom catalogue. And I may then non-destructively further edit them in Lightroom.

  • Comprehensive Creative Suite 5 and 5.5 Hardware Requirements!
  • 11 Replies!
  • serial code photoshop cs5 extended mac?
  • Lightroom is my workflow tool, handling imports, rejections, most editing, a range of exports, Map, galleries, keyword and metadata searches, collections, etc. Apples and oranges. Photoshop is no match for Lightroom if you have to process a lot of RAW files. And Lightroom's file management ability is better than what you get in Bridge. The Photoshop workflow is fragmented, -you first have to organize manage your files in Bridge, then jump to PS, where you have to convert RAW files one at a time in Camera Raw. I have both Photoshop and Lightroom, but I do all my RAW file processing in Lightroom, -and you can do quite a lot in Lightroom, meaning that for most images I can do everything that needs to be done to them there.

    I only go to Photoshop for those images that need things done to them that I can't do in Lightroom. And let's not forget that in Lightroom, unlike Camera Raw, all your edits are non-linear and non-destructive you can jump back and forth in the history, or change just one thing without changing anything else. In Photoshop, once you've saved your changed version and exit the program you lose your history. For example, printers will no longer work, HP won't support the new OS, you have to buy a new printer Normally I will update programs and pay for perpetual license every few years and schedule this extra work load to work around my schedule.

    The last thing I need is Adobe forcing new problems on me right before I have to edit a large quantity of pictures. I know they can on my machine - for Windows as well as Adobe. So far, zero issues. I'm not going to say "I'll never use another Adobe product ever again". The Creative Cloud suite of programs is still the best, most tightly integrated package of related photography and graphic design software out there.

    Nothing else compares. But I'm a much less happy Adobe user because of this move of theirs, and they should take notice of that as I'm sure I'm not the only one that's going to be rather disgruntled by all this. That being said, a lot of people have mentioned Capture One in their posts on this article, and that makes me want to look at it more closely as a possible Lightroom alternative. Adobe should take notice of that as well.

    I think there's going to be a lot of push back from Adobe users on this dropping of older OS support, As a matter of fact, I'm counting on that. Maybe that will make Adobe think more about their consumers than their bottom line. And without their consumers there is no bottom line. Businesses need their revenue producing and business management software to be operable or they will have to close their doors.

    To install a major upgrade, every significant application in the organization needs to be tested with the new OS version prior to distributing the new OS version. Far less extensive testing is required to verify specific changes that are contained in security patches and bug fixes. Also patches and fixes can be applied discretely. If a patch has problems it can be reported to Microsoft and resolved. This is not the case for a new OS version or completely new OS. There are just to many changes for a discrete approach. Companies cannot re-certify their entire software base a couple of times a year to accommodate Adobe's operational efficiency requirements.

    I am not one for conspiracy theories, but I am willing to bet that Microsoft is offering Adobe some pretty good incentives to push Windows 10 on its users. But, like Adobe Creative Cloud, Windows itself will soon become a service that you pay monthly for. Don't pay, and you don't use your computer. After all, having their customers over a barrel is exactly what Adobe and Microsoft would want.

    Microsoft can't charge a sub for their operating system. Apple possibly could because those that buy Apple are fine with constantly giving them money, but the minute you try and charge a sub for the most widely used OS in the world, is the minute your OS is no longer the most widely used. I think Microsoft will do what it wants, and being that Windows is so well entrenched, that may provide just the right reason to do so. Windows 10 was given away for free because that will very likely be the on-ramp to Windows as a service.

    They've already made Office a subscription service, so why not Windows? Software companies are seeming to really love this idea of renting their products rather than selling them. And Adobe has itself to thank for this trend. Skyscape Office as a sub makes some sense though. You know what's funny? Remember how many people here were predicting the demise of Adobe when they announced Creative Cloud?

    Remember eveybody saying they're not using Photoshop and Lightroom anymore? Yeah, I stayed with Adobe also. And Adobe has had increasing record profits since. And if it is determined that I am running a no longer supported OS, will Adobe allow me to terminate a 12 month CC Photography subscription without charging me an early cancelation fee? One of the promises of the CC subscription is the receipt of updates as they are released.

    Adobe will continue to release updates, but by their decision on supported OSs, it appears that they will deny them to me if I remain on WIN 7. My question was based on the loss of value of the plan by this. And, for a moment, my entire set-up was completely up-to-date, from top to bottom, inside and out.

    In that case the Creative Cloud Desktop — the management application for all Creative Cloud apps — should scan my computer specs, warn me that I am not eligible for a major version update AND continue to provide minor security and performance updates for my existing software as part of Long Term Support LTS. Adobe may choose not to support a specific configuration in a future major software revision. Don't know why supporting Windows 7 is hard. It's not like Adobe takes much advantage of the OS features, after all.

    I've been thinking about dropping CC; now they've helped me with the decision. I'm glad I never deleted CS6: Buh bye. For photography alone, there are just so many dang good, cheap options now. If Affinity's In Design alternative turns out good, that could be a very viable option for freelance designers that are just over Adobe. Why would you worry about deleting CS6?

    As an expert in Healthcare IT, I can tell you that many times something like FDA approval of a class B medical device will not allow software updates until they are approved through re-testing and certification. No it isn't. As you said, your example doesn't apply here, so it is a bad example. Staying on old unpatched system is a very bad practice. No readon to support 50 versions of windows. Adobe never supported "50 versions of Windows". We're only talking about support for the prior years of Windows Windows 8.

    Your point is invalid. If you insist on being a pedant by refusing to register and engage the true point Mark is making Microsoft is dropping support for Windows 7 in Jan , it is unreasonable to ask software companies to support deprecated products and keeping your OS up to date minimizes your risk. This is a fact of life. You don't like it, buy someone else's product, that's your right Actually every major windows update has it's own problems and workarounds. So they have to workaround a lot of versions, maybe not 50 but more than 10 versions.

    How about just not upgrading your Adobe apps? Moving from CS6 to on the Apps did nothing but introduce bugs and inconsistencies that are not getting fixed. Most people will quit lightroom before they upgrade to a pay to play os like Windows 10 updates only available by paid subscription coming soon.

    HI barrym, I think this is a misunderstanding re Microsoft. Windows 10 will not have paid subscription updates. There is a new Microsoft Managed Desktop Service that will be subscription based for Enterprise customers. But there is no concept that this this is a replacement for Windows FYI I dont want updates, I mine cryptocurrency and every update kills mining so my updates are disabled so I dont mind either way.

    Best Computer for Adobe Creative Cloud

    Also use Lightroom Classic have no intention of using the cloud version. You keep spreading disinformation. All your articles clearly state this is for Enterprise customers. Big businesses who get volume licensing discounts. It's an optional service to help them stay updated. Microsoft hasn't even acknowledged if this is true. You're reporting rumors and misrepresenting them. Hi barry The managed services are for Enterprise, not consumer systems. Those references are principally rumours. This is why I quit the It profession back in the day.

    People running windows 3. With 2 mega of ram. String, he means people with 15 year old machines complaining a brand new, intensive application runs poorly or not at all. Expectations should be realistic. You question the validity of his claim that he quit an entire career because people ran software on minimum requirements? Seems like a no brainer. I know my pc came with Windows 7, the upgrade to 8 was free, and so was the upgrade to In my experience, Windows 10 is actually faster than 7.

    1. Adobe Creative Cloud system requirements!
    2. Dreamweaver CS5.5 System Requirements;
    3. Best Computer for Adobe Creative Cloud?
    4. mac os x backups storage.

    You didn't try very hard when you googled. This is current news. The OS's have hit a plateau on performance and features. Why else do you think they were giving away Windows 10 for so long? It wasn't because they were being nice. It's about constant income of money. One thing you've clearly ignored is that "Microsoft Managed Desktop" is an optional service for keeping large companies' networks of workstations up to date as opposed to the normal twice-a-year updates that they would have to manually install, right?

    They did this over a decade ago, and started selling the service as Office No one had to rent Windows then either. Fox News is king of fake news but opinions aside, managed desktops are for businesses that spend a bundle keeping their software updated. No way Microsoft is going to concede the desktop OS to Apple. Reilly Diefenbach: You would think intuitive RAW conversion software that produces excellent results isn't the meanest feat.

    Also, I appreciate to be given choices to pick from. What would be wrong with that? This senseless bashing of particular brands or makers, be it Adobe or DxO or whoever, is merely a detraction from photography. Lightroom 4 came along with Process and blew everyone out of the water. Still the best, and boys, the new Auto button is amazing. A whole shot event in a couple of hours, with quality. Don't try this with any other software. Amusing people who buys the latest high tech camera w those megapixels, shoot raw but use junky outdated computers Can afford to buy new car but wants to keep old car tires Then complain car runs slow.

    I do see where you're coming from but I'm still running Windows 7 on my desktop and I assure you it's not a piece of junk Race cars run on slicks--little or no tread, because it grips better on a dry track. They change so often because they also are thin, again for better traction, and high speed wears them out quickly.

    Street and track--different requirements. Of course this thread is all tongue in cheek. Adobe is limiting the OS's it supports because it makes programming easier and cheaper. Just watch for the price reductions that follow. OMG - they don't make A tracks anymore and it doesn't come standard in a car. I still use Elements 11 an' it works with ALL my machines in Raw, but it cannot compare to better software, so there!

    As to Adobe: I walked alone between some old adobe haciendas. Suddenly, I heard the plaintive cry of a young Mexican girl You better come home, Speedy Gonzales Away from tannery row Stop all a your a-drinkin' With that floozy named Flo Come on home to your adobe And slap some mud on the wall The roof is leakin' like a strainer There's loads a roaches in the hall Speedy Gonzales, why don't cha come home?

    Speedy Gonzales, how come ya leave me all alone? Adobe is setting it up so Adobe CC will be the preferred software for pros, and Adobe Elements will be the preferred software for everyone else. Amateurs just need to buy a copy of Elements every five years, or whenever they buy a new camera, and they will save tons of money by not paying for tools they will never need or never use.

    Of course, Adobe knows most of the amateurs want to have pro grade tools, because they think it will somehow improve their photos.

    [SOLVED] Hardware recommendation for AdobeCC/AfterEffects - Spiceworks

    And it rarely does. I dunno Marty, I can only go by my own uses. At the prices photographers are being forced to pay for equipment, there is an excellent argument for forcing camera manufacturers to create their own pro level software and include it in the price, but in a world too greedy and mean to supply even a decent buffer, or a universal lens mount, what CAN be done to THEM to MAKE IT SO!!?? HI Decooler, there is no sense either business-wise or metaphorially that Microsoft owns Adobe. They are distinct and separate companies. This is a fact on the public record. I am simply Decooler, and yes sorry I checked online and Adobe are indendent of Apple and Microsoft etc.

    The EF-M 32mm F1. Find out what's new, what it's like to use and how it compares to its peers in our review in progress. The S1 and S1R are Panasonic's first full-frame mirrorless cameras so there's a plenty to talk about. We've taken a look at the design and features of both cameras and have some initial impressions, as well.

    Here's the one we recommend Aimed at sports shooters it promises improved AF, including advanced subject recognition, along with the highest-ever rated image stabilization system. If you're looking for a high-quality camera, you don't need to spend a ton of cash, nor do you need to buy the latest and greatest new product on the market. In our latest buying guide we've selected some cameras that while they're a bit older, still offer a lot of bang for the buck.

    These entry level cameras should be easy to use, offer good image quality and easily connect with a smartphone for sharing. Whether you've grown tired of what came with your DSLR, or want to start photographing different subjects, a new lens is probably in order. We've selected our favorite lenses for Sony mirrorlses cameras in several categories to make your decisions easier. The data breach we reported on last week did not only affect px but a total of 16 websites, including mobile image sharing platform EyeEm, Animoto, Artsy and Fotolog.

    Camera Rescue, a Finnish organization determined to rescue more than K analog, has already saved 46, cameras and plans to more than double that number by Independent lens manufacturer Sigma has announced that its new 28mm T1. At Dubai's recent Gulf Photo Plus event, Fujifilm showed off several of its early concept mockups for GFX cameras that sadly never made it into production.

    We took a closer look. Panasonic is well known for including impressive video features on its cameras. In this article, professional cinematographer Jack Lam explains one killer feature the company could add to its S series that would shake up the industry — and it all comes down to manual focus. Full-frame cameras get a lot of attention lately, but Technical Editor Richard Butler thinks that APS-C makes the most sense for a lot of people — and there's just one company consistently giving the format the support it deserves.

    The 12th International Garden Photographer of the Year winners have been announced. We've gathered the top photos from each category and rounded them up into a slideshow. Kosmo Foto has announced the release and opened pre-orders for its new Mono black-and-white film. Uber software engineer Phillip Wang has created a website that shows a portrait of a person that doesn't actually exist by using AI to merge multiple faces together. Dying to ask a question that hasn't been addressed anywhere else online? Click through for details.

    Got a couple of minutes? Then you have all the time you need to learn about Canon's second full-frame mirrorless camera body — and why it's a compelling option for someone stepping into full-frame for the first time. Xiaomi's new flagship Android smartphone is expected to be launched on February 24 at the Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. But having shot with it, we've become oddly fond of this little full framer.

    Pixelmator Pro has received an update with new and improved features, including support for Portrait Masks with images captured by the iPhone's Portrait Mode. There's a distinct high-end flavor to the options in the works. The new X-T30 may not be Fujifilm's flagship model, but it arrives with some very impressive features and specifications. Chris and Jordan have been shooting it for a few days and share their first impressions, along with a look at an iconic new building in their hometown of Calgary.

    The Fujifilm X-T30 is equipped with the same Fujifilm's new XF 16mm F2. Fujifilm's XF 16mm F2. We've been up and down the streets of snowy Seattle - a rare sight - to see just what our pre-production copy of this petite prime is capable of. Firmware version 2. Get a closer look at Canon's second full-frame mirrorless body and its unique combination of features, capability and price point.

    Canon has unveiled its second full-frame mirrorless camera: Touting its compact size and approachability for beginners, the RP uses a A pre-launch event gave us a chance to shoot a sample gallery to show what sort of image quality you can expect from the least-expensive digital full frame camera ever launched. Submit a News Tip! Reading mode: Light Dark.

    Dreamweaver CS6 System Requirements

    Login Register. Best cameras and lenses Now reading: Adobe won't support older operating systems with its next major Creative Cloud update comments. The Digital Picture. View Comments Comments All BirdieMaker One isn't forced to upgrade to the next version of CC, you can still run the version you currently run. Valps I'm sticking with DOS. CarpentersEye This is a very ignorant joke now-a-days. Sirandar This really isn't as Earth shaking as it's made out to be Sirandar Subscription is a seperate beast J Parker We use to own Adobe software -- now it owns us.

    GaryJP Precious little sympathy for those who didn't walk away when the subscription model got enforced. Peter Bendheim F Adobe. BaldCol Insightful comment. Thanks for your contribution. Jonsi So much misinformation going on And it's only a rumor because Microsoft has never mentioned it. GuyMcKie It is still a project. Big enterprises will avoid it for security reasons.

    Get the app. Get the map.

    Adobe can't mess with me any more Moved to Affinity from Adobe few years ago J Parker Affinity is incredible -- and it just keeps getting better. Francis Sawyer Affinity is a good alternative, but their refusal to fix some glaring UI-design defects has sadly hobbled their products. Flying Disc Hawaii like what? I'm so sorry Tapper IMO, Adobe is a bad company that deserves no support. Jonsi Those articles have existed for many years and get updated all the time.

    Have you ever used Google? Current MBPs are an insulting joke. Flying Disc Hawaii One way of bypassing the issue that you see about not being able to install any system is to Carbon Copy Clone a working system onto the target device. CarpentersEye If you're new then flip back and forth for a good while until get used to it. LensBeginner PhilDunn nothing like a specific, detailed and well-argumented statement, eh? Lea5 I agree with Phil. CarpentersEye Ha! As if Adobe has no shills. CarpentersEye Q. Do you think using Adobe products and high prices makes you a pro?

    That is fact. ArthurS Some of us are concerned about more than just Photoshop and Lightroom. CarpentersEye "Ignorance is bliss" -The Matrix You are certainly welcome to miss out on all the other choices. Thanks for sharing Adobe PR BS. CarpentersEye Don't get bogged down with the many, good and different distributions and desktop manager options.

    ArthurS "Ignorance is bliss"? CarpentersEye You guys are not getting the big picture and most of you don't know what you are missing. CarpentersEye Stop comparing what you have not seen. CarpentersEye BECAUSE this stupid and evil thing adobe does and has done forever about one single and supposedly glorious manner a single new task functions "better" is completely overshadows by how many betters you get OVERALL and using the same logic with free to you open apps.

    CarpentersEye And another thing Jonsi Why would a company give away older versions of a software package whose price already had to be reduced drastically to compete with the others? They want more sales, not less. ArthurS I have a big question as to whether "moving ahead" with an application's features is that tied to the OS version. Windows 7 SP1 bit will continue to be supported. Reply Pete Green says: August 27, at 2: Jonsi Probably true, but don't forget Adobe also said Lightroom would never go subscription-only ;.

    I don't get it ArthurS It's really curious that Windows 7 will be supported, but not 8. CaPi Lens and Arthur: LensBeginner It's curious, because in other situations software enterprises have pushed their timeline without much regard to adoption figures. Samb15 Windows 7 is still used and demanded in many critical systems and production environments, because Windows 10 has forced updates -- this introduces instability and security problems.

    LensBeginner Samb15 This is precisely why I stayed away from CaPi Lens: Bad luck for you and me both, man. GaryJP And we all know how long you can trust Adobe assurances. ArthurS And actually, if we're going to play a "numbers game" as to which OSes Adobe should support, then you could make the argument that they shouldn't support MacOS at all.

    BaldCol Are you critisising Adobe because you won't be able to use an illegal version of Windows? ArthurS If you're using a pirated version of Windows I have no sympathy. Flying Disc Hawaii or people will not update a system that is working fine. Southdownswolf Adobe and MS? Mark B. After School Sports My main uses for creative software is to work on marketing for a small consumer goods startup. WT21 Not liking this at all. Waiting for the rumoured MacMini Pro. Boomanbb LR6 will not suddenly stop working and no one is forcing you to buy Adobe products, try not to overreact.

    Zeee Lots of overreaction - kinda. Phil BH Well, at some point it will lose camera RAW updates, then it will no longer support newer cameras, so once you buy a new camera, it will effectively, stop working. Zeee Is that so. Francis Sawyer Lame strawman, Zeee. DNG has nothing to do with it. And you know what he means by NEW camera, so stop playing dumb. Zeee Maybe you should stop playing so dumb or is it something else? Zeee I meant to say LR6.

    Not you Phil. I was referring to general comments. Barry Pearson PhilDunn: